Skip to main content

Trump’s $100,000 fee for H-1B worker visas challenged in lawsuit

 A coalition of unions, employers and religious groups filed a lawsuit on Friday seeking to block US President Donald Trump’s bid to impose a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas for highly-skilled foreign workers.



The lawsuit filed in federal court in San Francisco is the first to challenge a proclamation Trump issued two weeks ago announcing the fee as the Republican president moves to further restrict immigration to the United States.

Plaintiffs include the United Auto Workers union, the American Association of University Professors, a nurse recruitment agency and several religious organisations. They argued that Trump’s power to restrict the entry of certain foreign nationals does not allow him to override the law that created the H-1B visa programme.

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson in a statement said Trump’s administration engaged in lawful actions “discouraging companies from spamming the system and driving down American wages, while providing certainty to employers who need to bring the best talent from overseas


The programme allows US employers to hire foreign workers in specialty fields, and technology companies in particular rely heavily on workers who receive H-1B visas.

Critics of H-1Bs and other work visa programmes say they are often used to replace American workers with cheaper foreign labour. But business groups and major companies have said H-1Bs are a critical means to address a shortage of qualified American workers.

Employers who sponsor H-1B workers currently typically pay between $2,000 and $5,000 in fees, depending on the size of the company and other factors.

Trump’s order bars new H-1B recipients from entering the United States unless the employer sponsoring their visa has made an additional $100,000 payment. The administration has said the order does not apply to people who already hold H-1B visas or those who submitted applications before September 21.

Trump in his unprecedented order invoked his power under federal immigration law to restrict the entry of certain foreign nationals that would be detrimental to the interests of the United States.

He said that high numbers of lower-wage workers in the H-1B programme have undercut its integrity and that the programme threatens national security, including by discouraging Americans from pursuing careers in science and technology. He said the “large-scale replacement of American workers” through the H-1B programme threatens the country’s economic and national security.

The plaintiffs argue that Trump has no authority to alter a comprehensive statutory scheme governing the visa programme and cannot under the US Constitution unilaterally impose fees, taxes or other mechanisms to generate revenue for the United States, saying that power is reserved for Congress.

“The Proclamation transforms the H-1B programme into one where employers must either ‘pay to play’ or seek a ‘national interest’ exemption, which will be doled out at the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, a system that opens the door to selective enforcement and corruption,” the lawsuit said.

The groups argue that agencies, including the US Department of Homeland Security’s US Citizenship and Immigration Services and US State Department likewise adopted new policies to implement Trump’s proclamation without following necessary rulemaking processes and without considering how “extorting exorbitant fees will stifle innovation.”

The H-1B programme offers 65,000 visas annually to employers bringing in temporary foreign workers in specialised fields, with another 20,000 visas for workers with advanced degrees.

The visas are approved for a period of three to six years.

India was by far the largest beneficiary of H-1B visas last year, accounting for 71 per cent of approved visas, while China was a distant second at 11.7pc, according to government data.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gaza Conflict / Palestine–Israel

 Hamas has officially responded to former U.S. President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace proposal regarding Gaza. According to reports, the group has accepted several of the points outlined in the plan, while leaving room for further negotiations on the remaining ones. This response has been described by international observers as “positive but conditional,” opening the door for potential dialogue after months of devastating conflict. Meanwhile, Donald Trump has publicly called on Israel to immediately halt its airstrikes on Gaza, stressing that continued bombardment would undermine chances for a ceasefire agreement. Despite his appeal, Israeli forces have carried out fresh air raids on several areas in Gaza, leaving dozens injured and worsening the humanitarian crisis. The situation has triggered a wave of international reactions. In Europe and other parts of the world, solidarity with Gaza has grown significantly. Large-scale protests have been organized, particularly after the i...

Palestine protests latest: Hundreds to march despite Starmer and police calls to cancel after Manchester attack

  Palestine protests latest: Hundreds to march despite Starmer and police calls to cancel after Manchester attack Defend Our Juries say more than 1,500 people have pledged to attend the protest in Trafalgar Square in the wake of a stabbing attack on a synagogue Pro-Palestine  protests  are set to go ahead despite Sir Keir Starmer and police  calling for it to be cancelled  following the terror attack on a synagogue in  Manchester  on Thursday. Defend Our Juries have organised an  event in Trafalgar Square  on Saturday afternoon, which could see more than 1,500 people attend to peacefully sit and hold cardboard signs saying “I  oppose genocide . I support Palestine Action”. Scotland Yard chief Sir Mark Rowley had asked for protests to be postponed due to the drain on resources while extra officers are stationed at synagogues. He also warned the protests “will likely create further tensions and some might say lacks ...

Pakistan Pitches New Arabian Sea Port to the United States

  Pakistan is courting the United States with an ambitious proposal to build a new deep-sea port on the Arabian Sea, aiming to strengthen its economic ties with Washington and diversify its strategic partnerships beyond China. According to diplomatic sources, the port project is being presented as an alternative to Gwadar, which is heavily influenced by Beijing under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The proposed site is believed to be Pasni, Balochistan, a coastal city strategically located between Gwadar and Karachi. Pakistani officials argue that the new port would serve as a gateway for mineral exports, particularly from the country’s rich copper and gold reserves in Reko Diq and other Balochistan mines. With global demand for critical minerals rising, Pakistan hopes the project will attract American investment and align with U.S. efforts to secure supply chains outside Chinese influence. The initiative comes at a time when Islamabad’s relations with Washington ...